In collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), computer scientists delve into the types of cyberattacks that manipulate AI and machine learning systems. Their comprehensive publication, “Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations” (NIST.AI.100-2), outlines the potential risks of deliberate interference in AI functionality.
As part of NIST’s broader commitment to fostering trustworthy AI, this work is designed to operationalize the AI Risk Management Framework. It is a critical resource for AI developers and users, providing insights into the diverse range of potential attacks and mitigation strategies. Despite the efforts, the publication underscores the challenge of creating infallible defense mechanisms, urging the community to contribute and refine existing defenses against these evolving risks. NIST computer scientist Apostol Vassilev, a key author, advocates for continuously improving defense strategies in the face of these emerging threats.
The impact of AI systems in daily life is immense, from autonomous vehicles to customer service chatbots. However, a significant concern revolves around the trustworthiness of the data used to train these systems. This data, often sourced from various interactions and online content, can be vulnerable to manipulation by malicious entities, leading to potentially harmful outcomes.
The challenge arises as AI systems learn from extensive datasets that can’t feasibly be monitored or filtered by humans. This susceptibility creates opportunities for attacks on AI systems, resulting in undesirable behavior. For instance, chatbots might adopt offensive or biased language if exposed to crafted malicious inputs.
The report delineates four primary types of attacks on AI systems:
- Evasion Attacks: These occur post-deployment and aim to manipulate inputs to alter the system’s response. For instance, modifying road signs to confuse an autonomous vehicle.
- Poisoning Attacks: These attacks happen during training by injecting corrupted data. For instance, embedding inappropriate language into training data to influence chatbot behavior.
- Privacy Attacks occur during deployment and aim to glean sensitive information about the AI or its training data, potentially exploiting weak points or sources.
- Abuse attacks involve inserting incorrect information into legitimate sources, leading the AI to absorb incorrect data. Unlike poisoning attacks, abuse attacks aim to repurpose the AI’s intended use through false information.
The strategies proposed in the report aim to assist developers in mitigating such attacks, offering an understanding of potential threats and corresponding approaches to minimize damage. However, given the sheer scale of data involved and the evolving nature of these attacks, there’s no foolproof method to safeguard AI systems from all misdirection.
Professor Alina Oprea from Northeastern University emphasizes the simplicity of certain attacks, citing poisoning attacks that could be executed by controlling a small subset of training data.
The study, co-authored by researchers including Alie Fordyce and Hyrum Anderson from Robust Intelligence Inc., outlines various attack classifications and proposes mitigation strategies. However, it admits that current defenses against adversarial attacks within AI systems remain incomplete.
Vassil Vassilev, involved in the publication, stresses the importance of acknowledging these vulnerabilities, cautioning that despite AI advancements, the technology remains susceptible to attacks with potentially severe consequences. He emphasizes the unresolved theoretical challenges in securing AI algorithms, asserting that claims of complete solutions at this stage are misleading.
FAQs
1. What is adversarial machine learning, and why is it a concern?
Adversarial machine learning refers to deliberate attempts to manipulate AI systems by introducing crafted inputs or attacks during training or deployment. It’s a concern because these attacks can lead to undesirable outcomes, bias, or compromised functionality in AI systems.
2. What is the NIST.AI.100-2 publication about?
The NIST.AI.100-2 is a comprehensive taxonomy and terminology guide that outlines potential risks and mitigation strategies in AI systems. It aims to help developers and users understand different types of attacks and defenses in AI.
3. What are the primary types of attacks on AI systems mentioned in the publication?
Categorizing attacks into four main types: evasion attacks (altering system responses post-deployment), poisoning attacks (corrupting training data), privacy attacks (exploiting sensitive information during deployment), and abuse attacks (inserting false information into legitimate sources).
4. How do these attacks impact AI systems in real-world applications?
These attacks can lead to various consequences, such as biased behavior in chatbots, altered decision-making in autonomous vehicles, compromised data privacy, or the repurposing of AI systems for unintended uses.
5. What are the proposed mitigation strategies in the NIST publication?
Strategies to mitigate attacks, aiming to minimize potential threats. However, it highlights the challenge of creating foolproof defenses due to the vastness of data involved and the evolving nature of these attacks.
[To share your insights with us, please write to sghosh@martechseries.com]
