Organizations today find themselves facing an uncomfortable reality: exponentially growing telemetry streams drive management costs through the roof while, simultaneously, vendor lock-in blocks rapid adaptation to evolving AI toolchains. Multiple data entry points create a greater attack surface which increases security vulnerabilities, as well as compliance headaches, and all just as data sovereignty regulations are tightening worldwide. The traditional approach of outsourcing pipeline management to vendors has become unsustainable, pushing CIOs to seek to reclaim control of their data infrastructure.
The Crisis of Convergence
Enterprise telemetry has exploded. Rapid growth in cloud infrastructure, microservices, applications, and IoT devices generate huge data volumes, much of which is really just noise, inflating storage costs while obscuring meaningful insights. In a nutshell, organizations pay to collect, store, and process data that has minimal business value.
All these issues are compounded by vendor lock-in. The proprietary formats, custom APIs, and ecosystem-specific tools restrain such movements to breakthrough technologies or emergent business needs without substantial rework and cost. What the vendors marketed as convenience has turned out to be a strategic straitjacket.
Security and compliance pressures increase the urgency. Every point of data entry extends potential vulnerabilities. Every vendor relationship brings potential vulnerabilities. Meanwhile, increased data sovereignty regulations and shifting U.S. surveillance laws have pushed data location and transparency to boardroom-level issues that impact market access and corporate reputation.
Also Read: CIO Influence Interview with Carl Froggett, Chief Information Officer (CIO) at Deep Instinct
Why Pipeline Ownership Is No Longer Optional
Three converging factors make pipeline ownership today a necessity.
1. AI has fundamentally changed data requirements –
Machine learning models need large volumes of high-quality and well-governed data. But with no pipeline control, you can’t guarantee the quality or even the availability your AI systems need. And as AI capabilities increasingly define competitive advantage, losing infrastructure control means ceding strategic ground to competitors who retain it.
2. Economics have shifted dramatically –
The cloud costs that were reasonable at small scales balloon with data growth. Third-party observability tools charging for ingestion volume become prohibitively expensive as telemetry grows exponentially. Monthly bills reflect tolerated inefficiencies rather than value extracted – luxuries organizations can no longer afford in today’s lean-focused environment.
3. The technology landscape has matured –
Cross-functional open-source toolkits, detailed documentation, and engaged communities of practitioners make it possible to own the capability in-house. Expertise that was once scarce is now available. Where the question once asked was if a company could own its pipelines, now it’s if they should. Undoubtedly, the more frequent response is yes.
Bridging the Gap in Expertise
Building telemetry pipelines requires deep knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, security, and machine learning operations. Without proper guidance, companies risk creating systems that test well but fail under production load or cannot adapt to changing needs.
Operational complexity doesn’t end with initial builds. Keeping pipelines reliable and performant demands expertise in health monitoring, quality troubleshooting, performance optimization, and graceful degradation implementation. Pipelines are sources of instability rather than insight enablers without operational maturity.
Perhaps the biggest challenge is cultural transformation. In-house pipeline ownership means accepting responsibility from vendors that they’ve traditionally shouldered. Closing the gap in expertise requires investing in capability building and AI-infused tooling – a difficult mindset shift for organizations that are accustomed to outsourcing their infrastructure concerns.
Executive Strategy
Successful implementation requires balancing ambition with pragmatism through the following approaches:
1. Standardize with Open Protocols –
Use industry-adopted standards like OpenTelemetry for portability and lock-in free. This gives common language to the teams, makes knowledge sharing easier, and gets support from recently launched or about-to-launch platforms.
2. Design for modularity –
Create composable components that can mix and match, depending on need, rather than monolithic pipelines that treat all data identically. This gives independent flow optimization, r******** experimentation, and scaling aligned to actual demand.
3. Implement intelligent filtering early –
Filter low-value telemetry at the source; route data types appropriately. This can radically reduce costs while improving signal quality. Understanding data value patterns upfront provides compounding returns.
4. Build meta-observability –
Your observability infrastructure needs its own observability. Instrument pipelines to monitor health, track flows, identify bottlenecks, and detect anomalies. When systems fail, visibility into what’s happening and where maintains reliability at scale.
5. Prioritize data quality and governance –
Ensure this is done from day one by providing validation at ingestion, ensuring consistent schemas, building audit trails that allow lineage tracking, and developing policies for retention, access, and privacy. These are measures to prevent quality issues from cascading down into costly downstream problems.
Futureproofing Your Infrastructure
Ensuring your organization is prepared for future evolutions is key to seamless continuity. Owning the pipeline doesn’t mean no vendors; rather it means those vendors support and don’t constrain the architecture. Some important pointers for futureproofing your pipeline include:
- Control collection by instrumenting with open standards, deploying collection agents you control and formatting data in vendor-neutral ways. This keeps options open for ultimate data use.
- Implement tiered storage optimized for access patterns, including hot for recent data, warm for occasional access, and cold for compliance and long-term retention. This enables cost optimization at this layer based on actual usage rather than vendor-imposed policies.
- Own the processing layer where value extraction happens: running open-source platforms, writing custom processing for edge cases, and developing machine learning models for anomaly detection. Control enables continuous improvement tailored to business
- Build with AI readiness, even without current deployment. Structure data for model training, maintain AI-required quality standards, create labeling capabilities for supervised learning, and design storage serving high-throughput training patterns efficiently. Organizations retrofitting AI onto unprepared infrastructure face significant technical debt.
The Strategic Imperative
CIOs realize data infrastructure is just too critical to outsource to vendors. Much like networking and security capabilities, which were once outsourced but have since been pulled in-house, pipeline ownership is fast becoming a core competency. Many organizations are in multi-year journeys, building capabilities incrementally.
The key is starting with a clear vision and taking deliberate steps toward it. Organizations taking control now will use AI more effectively, have superior security and compliance, control their costs, and set themselves up to adapt to changes in the future. They’ll emerge with compounding competitive advantages as data capabilities enable faster innovation, better decisions, and more effective operations. Those that delay risk entrapment from technical debt, vendor lock-in, and architectural decisions made when infrastructure was seen as a commodity, not a strategic asset.
In an AI-driven world, owning the data pipeline isn’t about cost reduction or operational efficiency-it’s about strategic relevance where data capabilities separate winners from losers. CIOs acting decisively now position their organizations to thrive while competitors remain stuck with yesterday’s vendor-dependent architectures.
Catch more CIO Insights: Encrypting AI “In Use”: Why Standard Security Fails at the Critical Moment
[To share your insights with us, please write to psen@itechseries.com ]
